The majority (5-4) ruling in the Obamacare Supreme Court case stated that the individual mandate is Constitutional because it is under Congress’s power to tax. While this ruling was seen a minor vicotry because it finally put a cap on what Congress could do in its “regulat[ion] of interstate commerce”, it can also be seen as a vast new mandate given to the federal government.

Under the ruling, there is essentially no limit on what the government can now “force” you to do. If it deems something is in the best interest of the populace, then Congress can say that you must partake in action A or be subject to tax X. There really is no limit, if you think about it, to what will not ultimately be seen as for the public good. It is specifically this argument, when presented to the Administration’s attorneys that resulted in incoherent repsonses.

Another Get More Information generic viagra benefit it proffers to ED patient is suggested to avail only prescribed dosage during the treatment. Other generic medicines taken to combat problems buy tadalafil australia on erectile dysfunction comes in the name of kamagra tablets, kamagra jelly, valif jelly and kamagra gels. Many recent policy documents continue to put managers front and center; for example, Gene Bottoms and Kathy O’Neill (2010) characterize the manager as the “chief learning officer” who bears “ultimate responsibility for success or failure of the enterprise.” However, a growing number of researchers say that instructional management and leadership is distributed across the community, with managers, superintendents, administrators, and policymakers having complementary responsibilities (King; Richard Elmore 2000;. generic levitra mastercard pdxcommercial.com You can cialis pills uk consume healthy diet regularly to maintain upbeat desire for lovemaking with your beautiful woman. Let’s play a little scenario: There are currently more than a handful of scientists that claim that carbon dioxide is the cause of global warming or climate change. Congress can take these studies, say that it is in the best interest for America that everyone must buy electricity only produced from zero-net carbon dioxide producers or face a tax. (Nevermind that these renewable sources only can provide about 3% of the needed energy.) Hence, there is now a valid tax imposed that will lead all Americans to forego electricity or pay steep fines.

You may say that example is reasonable, because the health of the planet is at stake. I don’t believe so, but we can also take this example to the absurd. Let’s focus on health care since it is the basis of the tax. Suppose that Congress now decides that people should not consume any type of processed foods. In order to follow through with this reasoning, Congress passes a 20% tax on any type of processed food (basically anything that comes in a package). Now, we don’t live in a facist country, you still have choices on what you are going to eat, but if you choose the wrong thing, then you have to pay significantly more. That is not the America that our forefathers envisioned for us.